Proponents of the journal emphasize academic freedom, asserting that rigorous inquiry should not be restricted by a contributor’s past. They argue that Rhoades’ unique perspective—as both a participant in and critic of the adult film industry—adds value to discussions on media ethics, labor rights, and feminism. Conversely, detractors warn that academic journals risk damaging public trust by associating with figures whose careers are perceived as ethically contentious. This dilemma raises critical questions: Should academic discourse prioritize engagement with controversial topics over the credentials of the individuals involved? Can a former adult performer credibly advocate for industry reform from an academic platform?

Possible sources of information: news articles about the journal's issue with Lana Rhoades, any official statements from the journal or university if applicable, academic articles discussing the intersection of adult entertainment and academia.

The journal’s February 2023 issue included Rhoades as a co-author on an article titled "The Impact of the Porn Industry on Society: A Critical Review." Critics argue that her involvement undermines the journal’s academic credibility, questioning whether her public persona conflicts with scholarly rigor. Some scholars allege that featuring Rhoades lends unwarranted legitimacy to the adult entertainment industry, while others defend the journal’s right to explore topics like pornography through diverse, interdisciplinary lenses—especially when the author is a critical outsider to the industry.